T.O. In B-Lo: A List posted by Frederick Barry
In an effort to stimulate debate with the critics, who seem to like to engage in a strategy known as "closing down the debate," this is a list of all the reasons Terrell Owens will fare far better in Buffalo than he has on any other team. Also, there may be a point or two regarding why his acquisition was intelligent on the part of Buffalo. Here goes (and I sure do hope I am right):
1. The most common complaint: T.O. is a cancer in the locker room. My logical response: There is less ego in the Buffalo Bills locker room than there have been in other locker rooms he has been a part of. The Bills' locker room has enough room for his ego and, in fact, have thus far welcomed it. Further, Buffalo is the smallest market Owens has ever played in. Before this, he played in San Francisco, Philadelphia, and Dallas. These three teams are large market teams that generally draw a good deal of media attention with or without Owens. Buffalo has been getting a lot of attention lately - but it is because Owens is there now. Since he is playing in a smaller market and is the biggest attention draw on the team (due to personality as well as skill. I am not willing to say he is Buffalo's only talent; the defense is stacked if healthy, Marshawn Lynch is a stud, Lee Evans is fantastic, etc.) he can bask in the attention instead of crumble under the weight. I do not need to remind NFL fans of the infamous crying interview.
2. This point stems from the first one. The largest reason Owens was a cancer was because he is a competitive winner. Buffalo is cognizant of this. They will get him the ball because they need him to have it. If Owens has the ball, touchdowns happen. Owens scored more touchdowns last season himself than the entire Bills offense. They will use him more than other teams have in the past. Need I remind everyone of the Romo to Witten disaster last season when their play-off hopes were hanging by a thread? Instead of giving the ball to Owens, Romo threw two passes to Witten that were incredibly off the mark. In fact, Witten did not even turn to acknowledge of the two passes from a choking Tony Romo. Sure, Owens may not have caught the ball and, if he had, may not have done anything with it. However, it sure as heck would've been better than passing to an obviously covered Witten (or no one).
Continue reading "T.O. In B-Lo: A List"
